1970-09-10
Page: 0
Foreign Relations of the United States
Volume E7
Documents on South Asia, 1969-1972
Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970–73, POL 15–PAK. Confidential; Limdis. Repeated to Dacca, Karachi, and Lahore.
September 10, 1970, 1125Z
SUBJECT:
PRESIDENT YAHYA ON PAKISTAN POLITICAL SITUATION
REF:
KARACHI 1692
TELEGRAM
Department of State
PAGE 0 1 RAWALP 07184 101322Z
47 51
ACTION NEA-08
R 101125Z SEP 70
FM AMEMBASSY RAWALPINDI
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 5059
INFO AMCONSUL DACCA
AMCONSUL KARACHI
AMCONSUL LAHORE
RAWALPINDI 7184
LIMDIS
1. DURING AMBASSADOR’S CONVERSATION WITH PRESIDENT YAHYA HERE SEPTEMBER 8, YAHYA SAID HE HAD BEEN GREATLY UPSET BY NEED FOR HIS DECISION TO POSTPONE GENERAL ELECTIONS FROM OCTOBER 5 UNTIL DECEMBER 7. HE SAID A NUMBER OF FACTORS HAD LED TO HIS DECISION. HE MENTIONED SPECIFICALLY THE INABILITY OF EXISTING BUREAUCRATIC MACHINERY TO COPE SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH FLOOD RELIEF REQUIREMENTS AND ELECTION PREPARATIONS IN EAST PAKISTAN. YAHYA NOTED THAT PAKS WERE COMPLETELY OUT OF PRACTICE ON ELECTION PROCEDURES.
2. YAHYA SAID HE HOPED NO ONE WOULD GET IDEA HE WAS WAIVERNG IN ANY WAY IN HIS DETERMINATION TO RESTORE CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT AND GET BACK TO BARRACKS.
3. YAHYA WENT ON TO VOICE DISAPPOINTMENT OVER COURSE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN TO DATE. HE SAID HE WAS APPALLED AT LACK OF LEADERSHIP AND PROGRAMS OFFERED BY THE POLITICIANS, MANY OF WHOM WERE ACTING LIKE SPOILED KIDS. HE HAD FAILED SEE EMERGENCE OF ANY STATESMAN-LIKE LEADERSHIP. WHEN HE BECAME DISCOURAGED, YAHYA SAID, HE HAD TO REMIND HIMSELF THERE HAD BEEN NO DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN AND THE POLITICIANS HAD LITTLE CONCEPTION OF RULES AND REQUIREMENTS of a DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. IN RESPONSE TO QUERY ABOUT PROBLEM OF LEADERSHIP, AMBASSADOR COMMENTED THAT FRACTIONALIZATION OF PARTIES, SUCH AS VARIOUS MUSLIM LEAGUES, SEEMED TO ADD TO PROBLEM. YAHYA AGREED BUT DID NOT EXPAND. (THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERABLE SPECULATION HERE RECENTLY TO EFFECT THAT MARTIALLAW ADMIN. ISTRATION (MLA) WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE MUSLIM LEAGUES MERGE.)
4. YAHYA SAID MUUIB (EAST Pak AWAMI LEAGUE LEADER) HAD TAKEN ON SELF-DEVELOPED CLOAK OF MYSTICISM. HE WAS CONCERENED OVER MUUIB’S PROMISES BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULTY TO FULFILL. YAHYA ADDED THAT MUUIB NEVERTHLESS REPRESENTED THE REAL STRENGTH IN EAST PAKISTAN AND AS SUCH HE HAD TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.
5. YAHYA DISMISSED MAULANA BHASHANI, EAST Pak LEADER OF NAP(LEFT), AS TOO OLD AND NO LONGER AN IMPORTANT POLITICAL FACTOR.
6. BHUTTO (Pak PEOPLE’S PARTYLEADER) WAS CHARACTERIZED BY YAHYA AS A YOUNG, BRIGHT DEMAGOGUE. YAHYA DESCRIBED BHUTTO’S OSTENSIBLE ROLE OF A PEOPLES’S SOCIALIST AS FARCE. IN YAHYA’S OPINION, BHUTTO IS POWER-CRAZY AND FASCIST AT HEART. YAHYA REFERRED TO BHUTTO’S STATEMENT IN RECENT PRESS CONFERENCE THAT YAHYA’S POSTPONEMENT OF ELECTIONS WAS CAUSED BY US/SOVIET PRESSUER. THAT STATEMENT HAD CREATED SOME TROUBLE FOR YAHYA WITHIN MLA AND HE HAD TO EXPLAIN THAT STATEMENT WAS TOTALLY FALSE. HE ASSUMEND BHUTTO HAD ISSUED STATEMENT DELIBERATELY SO AS TO CREATE FRICTION WITHIN MLA. YAHYA THEN ASKED THAT NOT SEE BHUTTO AGAIN UNTIL AFTER ELECTIONS. HE REFERRED TO PAKISTAN AS "CLOSED SOCIETY" AND COMMENTED THAT TEND EASILY TO BE MISREAD HERE.
7. COMMENT: AMBASSADOR FOUND YAHYA OBVIOUSLY DISCOURAGED. PRESIDENT SEEMED TO BE HARBORING DOUBTS ON PROSPECTS FOR FROMATION OF VIABLE NEW GOVERNMENT TO REPLACE MLA. YAHYA SEEMED MORE UNCERTAIN ON THIS SUBJECT THAN AMBASSADOR HAD FOUND HIM IN LAST PREVIOUS CONVERSATION IN JUNE. YAHYA APPEARED DETERMINED TO PROCEED WITH ELECTIONS ALTHOUGH HE IS PROBABLY KEEPING OPTIONS OPEN. POSITIVE FACTOE IS YAHYA’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT MUUIB WAS MAJOR FORCE IN EAST PAKISTAN. INFERENCE IS THAT YAHYA AT LEAST WILLING CONCEIVE DEALING WITH MUUIB IN POST. ELECTION PERIOD. GP-3