1972-02-04
By Clare Hollingworth
Page: 0
CLARE HOLLINGWORTH, in Rawalpindi, discusses the ineptitude that helped Pakistan lose the war with India
The commission of inquiry President Bhutto has set up to discover the main causes for the disastrous surrender of Pakistani troops in the Eastern Wing will find much of the documentary evidence has been destroyed and that those officers who played a vital role, including the Army Commander Lieut.-Gen. A. K. Niazi, as prisoners of war not available. A further frustration is that no one will ever ascertain what went on between the President and the junta in Islamabad.
But there is already ample evidence to support the fact that the war with India was lost long before Pakistan fighters made their pre-emptive strike against Indian air fields on Dec. 3, or the first bombs damaged the runway in Dacca. For the overall efficiency of the Pakistan army has severely run down by years devoted to the administration of martial law and those political involvement, this form of work entailed, at the expense of sound military training. Further, the Army in the East which was composed of almost four divisions, was not adequately equipped for war with India. Indeed its only air cover was provided by one squadron of Sabre jet fighters. The Eastern Command was, when hostilities began, completely cut off from possible reinforcement or resupply by the Indian Navy deployed in the Bay of Bengal.
Chronically short of artillery and equipped with outdated World War II field telephones, the majority of officers knew they were doomed long before the action began, for, in addition, the Bengali population were openly hostile and the defence forces were exposed to terrorist attacks from the Mukti Fouj guerrillas.
In the West, Pakistani generals claim the cease-fire was agreed before troops had been properly blooded or warmed up to the campaign as the positions they attacked, to cut the main Indian line of communications into Kashmir, were far more heavily defended than had been expected and there was insufficient time to outflank these three-storeyed concrete emplacements. The speed and scope of the disaster in the East was due to Gen. Niazi's refusal to take the advise of his staff or digest the information from the Intelligence Corps in Islamabad, who had warned him early last May that Indian troops were being redeployed around East Pakistan. Later, when it became obvious on Nov. 9-10 that an Indian attack in the East was imminent, Gen. Niazi failed to implement the No. 1 contingency plan to withdraw troops from the frontiers and evacuate the entire northern part of the country as well as the south-west.
The operational staff in Dacca claimed the defensive advantage obtained from the cover provided by the wide rivers of the Madhumati in the south¬west, the Meghna in the east and the Brahmaputra in the north-east would be each worth a division. But Gen. Niazi, supported by President Yahya Khan over a thousand mile away in Islamabad repeated endlessly that he "would be offensively defensive and not yield one inch of Pakistan territory.
The main Indian thrust was predictable. Guided by Mukti Fouj guerrillas they crossed marshlands and paddy fields, by-passing, here as elsewhere, heavily defended towns and the elaborate defensive positions the local Pakistan commanders had been encouraged to construct on main roads. Sympathetic villagers offered meat and rice as well as garlands. In the West, two columns advanced on Jessore avoiding the well-defended route from Beanpole, which was left to rot until the cease-fire 11 days later. These Indian incursions rendered the withdrawal of Pakistan troops virtually impossible when Gen. Niazi gave the belated order to retreat during the early hours Dec. 6. One of the few classical encounter of the war was fought near Jampur by the Indian Mountain Brigade, which with Mukti Fouj guerrillas under its command entered from the Assam frontier.